M. Duru1, Hayri Levent Yılmaz2, D. Altıntaş3, S. Güneşer3

1Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Acil Tıp Anabilim Dalı
2Çukurova Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Çocuk Acil Tıp Ünitesi
3Çukurova Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Çocuk Allerji-immunoloji Bilim Dalı

Abstract

Introduction: In the present study, we aimed to compare the efficiency of peroral (p.o.) methylprednisolone and nebulized budesonide in children with moderate-severe asthma exacerbations.
Material and Method: Twenty patients between the age of 6-14 years were included to the study and were unresponsive to nebulized salbutamol treatment at the dosage of 0.15 mg/kg for 3 times with 20 min. intervals. All the patients received nebulized salbutamol at the dosage of 6x0.15 mg/kg/day for 3 days. Ten patients (Group 1) received additional p.o. metylprednisolone at the dosage of 1 mg/kg for three times a day (maximum 60 mg/day), rest of the patients (Group 2) received additional nebulised budesonide at the dosage of 0.5 mg b.i.d for three days.
Results: In the first examination of the patients; age, gender, height, weight, duration of disease, frequency asthma exacerbations, symptoms and the clinic parameters were similar in both groups (p>0,05). In the first day (0, 4, 8, 16, 24. hours), third day and the 30 th. day the following analyses were done: PEF, arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), partial arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2), partial arterial carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO2), FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, FEF25-75, pulmonary index, asthma score, pulse, cough, wheezing, respiration rate. The patients examined again 30 days after discharge. Asthma score, pulmonary index, respiratory rate, relief duration of cough and wheezing were similar in both groups (p>0.05). Pulse rate decreased into normal limits earlier in Group 1 than Group 2 (p<0,05). These clinical parameters were improved at the end of the study and it was statistically significant (p<0.05). We found that the following parameters: PEF, SaO2, PaO2, PaCO2, FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, FEF25-75 were improved in the group of receiving p.o. methylprednisolone better than the nebulized budesonide, but it was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Pulse rate was returned to normal limits in shorter time in Group 1 than Group 2 (p<0.05).
Conclusion: We believed that nebulized budesonide has equal efficacy to p.o. metilprednizolon in children with moderate-severe asthma. In this group, because of practical using, tolerability and safety, nebulized budesonide can be an alternative to methylprednisolone in children who has contraindications for oral or intravenous steroid administration.